It’s not going to go the way you want if you an Obama fan….
Link :: Pollster says election could end in landslide
Interesting.
I’m not sure about your description, though - I go back and forth between calling them “fans” and “adherents”.
Craig - Would you mind for the slow people out there what “adherents” means?
Thanks!
I prefer to think of them as fans, since most don’t know anything about them, don’t know their policies and have not read into their books and lives.
I think I’ll let Google define it:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define:+adherents&btnG=Search
A better link:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define:+adherent&btnG=Search
Craig, the only problem with that definition is a little inaccurate in that most of his followers have little to no clue as to what he stands for or is about. Useful Idiots I think is a better term.
Name (required)
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Website
September 26th, 2008 at 9:08 am
Interesting.
I’m not sure about your description, though - I go back and forth between calling them “fans” and “adherents”.
September 26th, 2008 at 11:52 am
Craig - Would you mind for the slow people out there what “adherents” means?
Thanks!
I prefer to think of them as fans, since most don’t know anything about them, don’t know their policies and have not read into their books and lives.
September 26th, 2008 at 12:19 pm
I think I’ll let Google define it:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define:+adherents&btnG=Search
September 26th, 2008 at 12:22 pm
A better link:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define:+adherent&btnG=Search
September 26th, 2008 at 11:21 pm
Craig, the only problem with that definition is a little inaccurate in that most of his followers have little to no clue as to what he stands for or is about. Useful Idiots I think is a better term.